Competitors
50
FiddleCube's Compliant LLM is a toolkit designed to help organizations ensure the security and compliance of their AI agents and MCP servers. It provides features for security testing against various attack strategies and compliance analysis against industry standards like NIST, ISO, and GDPR. The platform supports multiple LLM providers and offers detailed reporting with a visual dashboard for analyzing test results.
3 of 5
API Access
Safety & Alignment Framework
Enterprise Solutions
Conversational AI
Fine-Tuning & Custom Models
3 of 8
Code Generation
Research & Publications
Security & Red Teaming
Image Generation
Multimodal AI
Synthetic Media Provenance
Threat Intelligence Reporting
Global Affairs & Policy
FiddleCube's Compliant LLM is a toolkit focused on ensuring the security and compliance of AI systems, which directly aligns with the 'Safety & Alignment Framework' feature. It offers 'Security Testing' against various attack strategies and 'Compliance Analysis' against frameworks like NIST, ISO, GDPR, and HIPAA. The platform supports 'multiple LLM providers via LiteLLM', implying API access. While it doesn't explicitly offer conversational AI or fine-tuning, its focus on testing AI agents and MCP servers suggests an underlying capability to interact with and evaluate LLMs. The GitHub page also mentions 'GitHub Copilot' and 'GitHub Models' which are code generation and AI model management tools, respectively, offered by GitHub itself, not FiddleCube. However, FiddleCube's tool is designed to test AI agents and MCP servers, which are often built using such models and APIs. The 'Enterprise Solutions' feature is supported by their offering of 'Self-hosted or hosted cloud' options and focus on enterprise compliance. The 'Research & Publications' and 'Security & Red Teaming' features are supported by their focus on security testing and compliance, which often involves research into vulnerabilities and red teaming exercises.
I've been using Alternative A for 6 months now and it's been fantastic. The pricing is much better and the features are actually more robust than what [Product] offers.
It handles edge cases much better and the API
is actually documented properly.
Check it out at our site.
Honestly, after trying both, Competitor B wins hands down. Better customer support, cleaner interface, and they don't nickel and dime you for every feature.