Competitors
50
Oso is an authorization-as-a-service platform that helps engineering teams implement and manage fine-grained access control for their applications, RAG pipelines, and AI agents. It provides a declarative policy language (Polar) to define authorization logic and offers SDKs for various programming languages to integrate and enforce permissions. Oso can be deployed in the cloud or self-hosted, and it focuses on centralizing and scaling authorization decisions.
3 of 10
API & Database Integrations
Code Customization
Access Control & Security
Drag-and-Drop UI Builder
Flexible Deployments
Drag-and-Drop UI Builder
Code Editor
Data Connectivity
API Integration
Workflows
3 of 18
Debugging & Monitoring
Version Control Integration
AI & LLM Integration
Audit Logs & Analytics
Workflow Automation
Mobile-Responsive Support
Prebuilt React Components
AI-Generated App Assistant
Custom Theming & Branding
Partner & Customer Portals
Natural Language App Generation
Source Control Integration
Security & Permissions
Hosting Options
Multipage Architecture
Component Localization
Usage Analytics
PDF Data Extraction
Oso is an authorization-as-a-service platform that allows developers to define and enforce fine-grained access control across applications, RAG pipelines, and AI agents. It provides a flexible DSL (Polar) for defining authorization logic, integrates with various data sources and APIs, and offers SDKs for multiple languages. While it doesn't directly offer a drag-and-drop UI builder or prebuilt React components for general internal tools, its core offering aligns strongly with the authorization and integration aspects of the Retool concept. The platform explicitly supports API & Database Integrations, Code Customization (via Polar DSL and SDKs), Access Control & Security (its primary function), Flexible Deployments (cloud or self-hosted), Debugging & Monitoring (troubleshooting tools, logs), Version Control Integration (CI/CD, Git-based workflows), and AI & LLM Integration (permissions for AI-native apps, RAG, agents).
I've been using Alternative A for 6 months now and it's been fantastic. The pricing is much better and the features are actually more robust than what [Product] offers.
It handles edge cases much better and the API
is actually documented properly.
Check it out at our site.
Honestly, after trying both, Competitor B wins hands down. Better customer support, cleaner interface, and they don't nickel and dime you for every feature.