Competitors
50
Go Back
Story consultation
foxprinteditorial.comSummary
FoxPrint Editorial provides professional editing and consultation services for authors, focusing on developmental edits, story consultations, and critiques to help writers improve their manuscripts. They offer in-depth analysis, feedback, and guidance on various aspects of storytelling and prose.
Feature Matches0/13
See all0/13
No common features found
PricingOne-time
See allOne-time
Story consultation
$350.00 one time
- Pre-consultation questionnaire
- 60-minute Zoom consultation
- Analysis and feedback on story strengths and weaknesses
- Suggestions for addressing stumbling blocks
- Author questions and discussion
- Recording of the call
- Unlimited email follow-up for clarification and questions
- Does not include looking over or offering feedback on revisions; additional consulting fees apply for this service
First Chapter(s) Critique
$500.00 one time
- Comprehensive editorial read of first three chapters or up to 50 pages
- 60-minute Zoom consultation
- Analysis and feedback on initial pages
- Written summary/road map for revisions
- Recording of the call
- Unlimited email follow-up for clarification and questions
- Not a full developmental edit
- Does not include looking over or offering feedback on revisions; additional consulting fees apply for this service
Overview Edit
$0.03 per unit
- Thorough evaluation of manuscript’s overall strengths and possible weaknesses
- Clear, actionable suggestions for addressing weaknesses
- Comprehensive, detailed editorial letter
- Without embedded notes (less granular than full developmental edit)
Full Developmental Edit (Single-pass)
$0.05 per unit
- Comprehensive, wide-ranging, deep-dive edit
- Consideration and evaluation of all aspects of story: plot, character development, structure, stakes, pacing, dialogue, style, voice
- Specific support for feedback and clear, actionable suggestions
- Manuscript with suggested changes and embedded comments/queries using Track Changes
- Extensive written editorial letter (big-picture comments)
- Moderate line edits for polishing prose
Multiple-pass edit
Custom
- Everything in a single-pass full developmental edit
- Detailed editorial overview letter with big-picture critique
- In-depth specific comments embedded in manuscript (Track Changes)
- Additional editorial passes (two or three, depending on author’s preferences and needs)
- Additional overview notes if needed
Rationale
The candidate, FoxPrint Editorial, offers editorial and consultation services for writers. This is a service-based business focused on helping authors refine their manuscripts, rather than an online publishing platform that enables writers to create, share, and monetize stories, or a platform with a recommendation engine for readers. None of the 'must-have' features for Medium (rich text editor, distribution & recommendation engine, membership monetization, reader engagement metrics, community feedback tools) are present in FoxPrint Editorial's offerings. The candidate is a professional editing and consultation service, not a content publishing and distribution platform.
Found via SearchPaid
See allbest alternatives to competitor product 2024
competitor vs alternative comparison honest review
GossipPaid
See allBest alternatives to [Product] in 2024?
Reddit·tech_enthusiast·2d ago·+142
I've been using Alternative A for 6 months now and it's been fantastic. The pricing is much better and the features are actually more robust than what [Product] offers.
Show HN: We built a better [Product]
Hacker News·startup_founder·5d ago·+89
After struggling with [Product]'s limitations, we decided to build our own solution.
It handles edge cases much better and the API is actually documented properly.
Check it out at our site.
[Product] vs Competitor B - which one should I choose?
Reddit·confused_buyer·Oct 14·+67
Honestly, after trying both, Competitor B wins hands down. Better customer support, cleaner interface, and they don't nickel and dime you for every feature.
Why we migrated away from [Product]
Hacker News·cto_mike·Oct 11·+234
The breaking point was when they changed their API without notice. We lost 3 days of productivity. Solution C has been rock solid for us since we switched.