Competitors
12
🚀
Discover 50+ More Competitors
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Unlock comprehensive insights into your competitive landscape.
Unlock Full ReportSummary
The Institute for the Future (IFTF) is a non-profit research and educational organization that helps individuals, organizations, and communities prepare for future changes. They offer strategic foresight services, custom research, training programs, and partnerships to anticipate trends, explore alternative futures, and build resilience.
Feature Matches6/15
See all6/15
Must Have
3 of 5
Bleeding-Edge Project Incubator
Modular Project Portfolio
Rapid Prototype Development
Community-Driven Funding Platform
Open Contributor Network
Other
3 of 10
Vision and Mission Framework
Communication and Outreach Channels
Strategic Roadmap Publishing
Universal Language Model (ULM)
Cognitive Engine Scaffold (Cogent)
Decentralized Personal AI Network (Entwood)
Orbital Waste Collection System (C.O.W.S)
Industrial Hemp Materials Lab (Hemp the World)
Blueprint Repository
Pitch and Funding Calls
Rationale
The Institute for the Future (IFTF) aligns with several features of Mad Bastard Labs, particularly in its role as a think tank focused on future technologies and societal changes. IFTF engages in 'bleeding-edge project incubation' through its research and advisory services, exploring topics like AI and climate action. It maintains a 'modular project portfolio' with various research initiatives and offers 'rapid prototype development' through its social simulation workshops and custom foresight research. The organization clearly states its 'vision and mission framework' to help prepare for a more sustainable and equitable world. They also have 'communication and outreach channels' through newsletters, events, and podcasts, and publish 'strategic roadmap publishing' through their Ten-Year Forecast and other reports. However, IFTF does not appear to have a 'community-driven funding platform' in the same decentralized, open-source contribution model as described for Mad Bastard Labs, nor does it explicitly mention an 'open contributor network' for co-development in the same manner. While they accept donations, it's not framed as a platform for funding specific projects by a broad community of backers. The focus is more on advisory services and partnerships rather than a decentralized R&D platform with open contributions and funding.
Found via SearchPaid
See allbest alternatives to competitor product 2024
competitor vs alternative comparison honest review
GossipPaid
See allBest alternatives to [Product] in 2024?
Reddit·tech_enthusiast·2d ago·+142
I've been using Alternative A for 6 months now and it's been fantastic. The pricing is much better and the features are actually more robust than what [Product] offers.
Show HN: We built a better [Product]
Hacker News·startup_founder·5d ago·+89
After struggling with [Product]'s limitations, we decided to build our own solution.
It handles edge cases much better and the API is actually documented properly.
Check it out at our site.
[Product] vs Competitor B - which one should I choose?
Reddit·confused_buyer·Dec 11·+67
Honestly, after trying both, Competitor B wins hands down. Better customer support, cleaner interface, and they don't nickel and dime you for every feature.
Why we migrated away from [Product]
Hacker News·cto_mike·Dec 8·+234
The breaking point was when they changed their API without notice. We lost 3 days of productivity. Solution C has been rock solid for us since we switched.